Slate Magazine
•US Politics
US Politics
65% Informative
The Supreme Court heard oral arguments on Thursday in a monumental battle over Donald Trump’s executive order stripping birthright citizenship from the children of many immigrants.
The justices barely discussed the constitutional question at the heart of the case; instead, they devoted most of the session to a debate about the three “universal injunctions” currently blocking Trump 's policy nationwide.
The administration's brash claims may have reminded the justices why these tools are so crucial in the first place.
The Supreme Court gave the president all the tools to bigfoot the judiciary, and now he’s doing it.
The most Solicitor general could promise is that they would “generally”—though not always—abide by circuit court judgments.
If it is true that lower court decisions apply only to the named plaintiffs, the government need not respect them as to other parties.
VR Score
68
Informative language
65
Neutral language
11
Article tone
informal
Language
English
Language complexity
43
Offensive language
possibly offensive
Hate speech
not hateful
Attention-grabbing headline
not detected
Known propaganda techniques
detected
Time-value
short-lived
External references
3
Source diversity
3
Affiliate links
no affiliate links