tippinsights
•Health
Health
79% Informative
University of Minnesota Prof. Rachel Hardeman 's rise to academic superstardom included major media coverage of her research on racial bias and maternal and infant mortality.
Now, two former employees allege that she plagiarized the research proposal that helped rocket her into a national figure.
Hardeman secured a landmark National Institutes of Health grant in 2021 with a hypothesis and methodologies she copied from her mentee’s dissertation proposal, they allege.
She will leave the university on May 14 , leaving the Center for Antiracism Research for Health Equity in jeopardy.
The central premise of Davis ’s dissertation was a hypothesized link between infant mortality and police brutality.
Davis said that Hardeman “plagiarized verbatim” the premise of her dissertation in January 2020 while tweaking it to suit her Minneapolis focus.
Hardeman simply retrofitted the same research question to focus on the August 2016 death of Philando Castile , she said.
Hardeman recruited Davis to execute the research aim plagiarized from her work, she said.
Hardeman encouraged staff to delete emails that could be subject to the Freedom of Information Act , Davis alleges.
University of Minnesota Office of Integrity found that there was no plagiarism but rather an honest error’ on Rachel Hardeman , Davis wrote.
VR Score
82
Informative language
85
Neutral language
57
Article tone
semi-formal
Language
English
Language complexity
64
Offensive language
not offensive
Hate speech
not hateful
Attention-grabbing headline
detected
Known propaganda techniques
not detected
Time-value
short-lived
External references
14
Source diversity
11
Affiliate links
no affiliate links
Small business owner?