welcome
Guardian

Guardian

Science

Science

In a recent article, we reported on a Cambridge University staff survey. We regret that an editing error led the article to say the figures were based on ‘staff who responded’

Guardian
Summary
Nutrition label

75% Informative

We regret that an editing error led the article to say the figures were based on “staff who responded” When “don’t know” responses are included, the percentage of staff dissatisfied with the handling of bullying and harassment falls.

The university rejects claims of a “cover up”, saying the results were shared with departmental heads and in relevant committees.

VR Score

83

Informative language

88

Neutral language

48

Article tone

formal

Language

English

Language complexity

53

Offensive language

not offensive

Hate speech

not hateful

Attention-grabbing headline

not detected

Known propaganda techniques

not detected

Time-value

medium-lived

External references

no external sources

Source diversity

no sources

Affiliate links

no affiliate links

Read full article

Small business owner?

Otherweb launches Autoblogger—a revolutionary way to bring more leads to any small business, using the power of AI.