The American Spectator
•Science
Science
69% Informative
Peter Bergen : Darwin ’s theory is a mishmash of multiple logically separate ideas.
He says it tries to account for opposite features of creatures: their similarities and differences.
Bergen says Darwin 's theory fails to explain why evolution failed to explain mysteries it had promised to explain.
He asks: What could drive the construction of animals that had never been seen on earth?.
Peter Bergen : Darwinian explanations for evolution are limp, despite limpness of his theory.
He says a campaign of arm-twisting from 1930 to 1950 curdled an abstract version of Darwin ’s theory into place in academia as the default explanation for evolution.
Bergen says neo-Darwinism has been entrenched there ever since, handed down from professor to graduate student.
As with the legendary fake villages, evolutionary theory consists of a thin façade cloaking a lack of substance.
Frontage of the theory is the bare premise that similarities among even the most diverse groups of life arose from common ancestry.
Yet if you search behind the veneer, there is neither convincing reasoning nor anything remotely based on experience to explain profound differences.
VR Score
61
Informative language
54
Neutral language
44
Article tone
informal
Language
English
Language complexity
54
Offensive language
not offensive
Hate speech
not hateful
Attention-grabbing headline
not detected
Known propaganda techniques
detected
Time-value
long-living
External references
4
Source diversity
4
Affiliate links
no affiliate links
Small business owner?
