Slate Magazine
•60% Informative
Supreme Court heard arguments in Trump v. Anderson , which challenges Donald Trump ’s ability to appear on the ballot in Colorado .
Dahlia Lithwick and Mark Joseph Stern discussed a threat that emerged from the right flank of the court during arguments.
Stern: The justices have full authority to step in and say: This is a meritorious case that we’ll consider seriously, and that is a frivolous one.
Justices like Roberts have rediscovered judicial humility and the beauty of letting the people decide and democracy working itself clean. That’s true of Dobbs , too, where the court said originalism was the hill they would die on regardless of the consequences. Now they’re saying, “Never mind originalism, we can’t have Colorado deciding an election for the other states.”.
VR Score
64
Informative language
66
Neutral language
28
Article tone
informal
Language
English
Language complexity
44
Offensive language
likely offensive
Hate speech
not hateful
Attention-grabbing headline
detected
Known propaganda techniques
detected
Time-value
short-lived
External references
4
Source diversity
4
Affiliate links
no affiliate links