logo
welcome
Guardian

Guardian

US supreme court justices have strange views on whether Trump is disqualified

Guardian
Summary
Nutrition label

59% Informative

Jonathan Mitchell, a far-right lawyer, is a fan of bald, legal bad faith.

He's more about coming up with novel legal schemes to get to his desired outcome and trusting federal judiciary will go along with him because they share his political proclivities.

By the end of the arguments, it was clear: what the justices will write will be a 9-0 or 8-1 decision.

Section three of the 14th amendment now seems set to be orphaned denied its status as self-effecting, curtailed in its enforcement by the states.

If states can’t enforce the ban on insurrectionists in office, then only Congress can.

And where would Congress do that? At the certification of the electoral votes on 6 January 2025.

VR Score

68

Informative language

69

Neutral language

22

Article tone

informal

Language

English

Language complexity

61

Offensive language

possibly offensive

Hate speech

not hateful

Attention-grabbing headline

not detected

Known propaganda techniques

detected

Time-value

short-lived

External references

no external sources

Source diversity

no sources

Affiliate links

no affiliate links

Read full article