Guardian
•US supreme court justices have strange views on whether Trump is disqualified
59% Informative
Jonathan Mitchell, a far-right lawyer, is a fan of bald, legal bad faith.
He's more about coming up with novel legal schemes to get to his desired outcome and trusting federal judiciary will go along with him because they share his political proclivities.
By the end of the arguments, it was clear: what the justices will write will be a 9-0 or 8-1 decision.
Section three of the 14th amendment now seems set to be orphaned denied its status as self-effecting, curtailed in its enforcement by the states.
If states can’t enforce the ban on insurrectionists in office, then only Congress can.
And where would Congress do that? At the certification of the electoral votes on 6 January 2025.
VR Score
68
Informative language
69
Neutral language
22
Article tone
informal
Language
English
Language complexity
61
Offensive language
possibly offensive
Hate speech
not hateful
Attention-grabbing headline
not detected
Known propaganda techniques
detected
Time-value
short-lived
External references
no external sources
Source diversity
no sources
Affiliate links
no affiliate links