The Federalist
•64% Informative
A federal appellate court upheld a lower court decision dismissing an NAACP challenge to Alabama ’s 2021 redistricting plan.
The decision left Democrats and the left-wing press deriding the decision as rolling back “increased minority power and representation in American politics” Yet, given that for approximately 50 years courts have assumed private parties could sue under Section 2 of the Voting Rights Act , the split 2 -1 decision seems likely to be reconsidered by the entire federal circuit court.
If the holding stands, however, it will tee up the question of who can sue to enforce the VRA to the conservative-majority Supreme Court .
The Eighth Circuit concluded that Supreme Court decisions that assumed Section 2 created a private right of action were not controlling, with the language merely dicta.
The NAACP has two choices now: It can ask the entire Eighth Circuit to rehear the case or seek review by the U.S. Supreme Court .
Of course, the better and more appropriate route would be for Congress to address the issue.
VR Score
76
Informative language
82
Neutral language
78
Article tone
formal
Language
English
Language complexity
63
Offensive language
not offensive
Hate speech
not hateful
Attention-grabbing headline
detected
Known propaganda techniques
not detected
Time-value
short-lived
External references
no external sources
Source diversity
no sources
Affiliate links
no affiliate links