Reason Magazine
•67% Informative
The revised version is what appears to be the result of pruning all the AI -hallucinated citations.
Or so theorizes the respondent's brief, which says, "Appellants likely used artificial intelligence to draft the opening brief" The appellant's motion to strike (filed well before the Respondent's brief) doesn't mention AI or otherwise explain the reason for the fake citations.
VR Score
82
Informative language
89
Neutral language
46
Article tone
formal
Language
English
Language complexity
76
Offensive language
not offensive
Hate speech
not hateful
Attention-grabbing headline
not detected
Known propaganda techniques
not detected
Time-value
medium-lived
External references
no external sources
Source diversity
no sources