Slate Magazine
•categories.
categories.
66% Informative
The Supreme Court dealt a devastating blow to the nation’s wetlands by rewriting a statute the court does not like to mean something it does not mean.
Ruben Navarrette: The Clean Water Act protects wetlands that are “adjacent” to larger bodies of water.
He says the majority crossed through the word "adjacent" and replaced it with a new test that gives landowners latitude to fill in, build upon, or otherwise obliterate some of the most valuable ecosystems on earth.
Alito relied almost entirely on policy arguments, peppering them with legalese to create the impression of an actual legal opinion.
Alito’s response to Kavanaugh and Kagan consists of one short paragraph that boils down to four words: Their opinions “cannot be taken seriously” Sadly, this is how our Supreme Court now works.
VR Score
71
Informative language
74
Neutral language
10
Article tone
informal
Language
English
Language complexity
55
Offensive language
not offensive
Hate speech
not hateful
Attention-grabbing headline
detected
Known propaganda techniques
detected
Time-value
short-lived
External references
5
Affiliate links
no affiliate links