AI Costs Threaten Entry-Level Jobs
This is a news story, published by Wired, that relates primarily to Luke Arrigoni news.
Luke Arrigoni news
For more Luke Arrigoni news, you can click here:
more Luke Arrigoni newsNews about Ai policy and regulations
For more Ai policy and regulations news, you can click here:
more Ai policy and regulations newsWired news
For more news from Wired, you can click here:
more news from WiredAbout the Otherweb
Otherweb, Inc is a public benefit corporation, dedicated to improving the quality of news people consume. We are non-partisan, junk-free, and ad-free. We use artificial intelligence (AI) to remove junk from your news feed, and allow you to select the best tech news, business news, entertainment news, and much more. If you like this article about Ai policy and regulations, you might also like this article about
many AI companies. We are dedicated to bringing you the highest-quality news, junk-free and ad-free, about your favorite topics. Please come every day to read the latest AI entrepreneur news, AI companies news, news about Ai policy and regulations, and other high-quality news about any topic that interests you. We are working hard to create the best news aggregator on the web, and to put you in control of your news feed - whether you choose to read the latest news through our website, our news app, or our daily newsletter - all free!
AI pricingWired
•Technology
Technology
AI Agents Are Too Cheap for Our Own Good
80% Informative
In 2007 , Luke Arrigoni earned $ 63,000 at his first job as a junior software developer.
Today , he says AI tools that write better code than he did back then cost just $120 annually .
He worries that underpriced AI tools encourage companies to eliminate entry-level roles.
GitHub 's Copilot costs $ 21 a month for an AI -assisted code editor.
Zed CEO Nathan Sobo expects AI companies to charge more over time because the current pricing models aren’t sustainable.
Some companies are hiring “ AI architects” to help oversee agentic systems and cut down on gaffes.
VR Score
81
Informative language
79
Neutral language
49
Article tone
semi-formal
Language
English
Language complexity
45
Offensive language
not offensive
Hate speech
not hateful
Attention-grabbing headline
not detected
Known propaganda techniques
not detected
Time-value
medium-lived
External references
7
Source diversity
7
Affiliate links
no affiliate links