This is a news story, published by Ars Technica, that relates primarily to Apple news.
For more Ai research news, you can click here:
more Ai research newsFor more news from Ars Technica, you can click here:
more news from Ars TechnicaOtherweb, Inc is a public benefit corporation, dedicated to improving the quality of news people consume. We are non-partisan, junk-free, and ad-free. We use artificial intelligence (AI) to remove junk from your news feed, and allow you to select the best tech news, business news, entertainment news, and much more. If you like this article about Ai research, you might also like this article about
large reasoning models. We are dedicated to bringing you the highest-quality news, junk-free and ad-free, about your favorite topics. Please come every day to read the latest systematic reasoning news, thought reasoning news, news about Ai research, and other high-quality news about any topic that interests you. We are working hard to create the best news aggregator on the web, and to put you in control of your news feed - whether you choose to read the latest news through our website, our news app, or our daily newsletter - all free!
Reasoning ModelsArs Technica
•Technology
Technology
90% Informative
Apple researchers say simulated reasoning models perform poorly on novel problems requiring systematic thinking.
The study was conducted by Apple researchers at the University of California .
They found the models performed poorly on four classic puzzles, including the Tower of Hanoi , checkers jumping, river crossing, and river crossing.
VR Score
94
Informative language
97
Neutral language
60
Article tone
formal
Language
English
Language complexity
88
Offensive language
not offensive
Hate speech
not hateful
Attention-grabbing headline
not detected
Known propaganda techniques
not detected
Time-value
long-living
External references
2
Source diversity
2
Affiliate links
no affiliate links
