This is a news story, published by USA Today, that relates primarily to Success news.
For more football news, you can click here:
more football newsFor more news from USA Today, you can click here:
more news from USA TodayOtherweb, Inc is a public benefit corporation, dedicated to improving the quality of news people consume. We are non-partisan, junk-free, and ad-free. We use artificial intelligence (AI) to remove junk from your news feed, and allow you to select the best sport news, business news, entertainment news, and much more. If you like football news, you might also like this article about
NCAA settlement. We are dedicated to bringing you the highest-quality news, junk-free and ad-free, about your favorite topics. Please come every day to read the latest College sports news, way college sports news, football news, and other high-quality news about any topic that interests you. We are working hard to create the best news aggregator on the web, and to put you in control of your news feed - whether you choose to read the latest news through our website, our news app, or our daily newsletter - all free!
NCAA enforcementUSA Today
•Sports
Sports
64% Informative
In theory, the settlement is a big step in the right direction to solving issues.
Success will require schools to do something that they’ve never done in the history of college sports: Acknowledge that the rules are in place for the common good and must be applied to everyone, including themselves.
College sports has never had that mentality.
It happened mostly because coaches and administrators facing penalties too often got better outcomes when they fought, refused to cooperate or found someone to throw under the bus.
But every time a major school with resources skates on a massive scandal, it chips away at the idea that schools are willing to be governed.
If not, the House settlement will fall apart quickly and take the entire structure of college sports down with it.
VR Score
69
Informative language
68
Neutral language
57
Article tone
informal
Language
English
Language complexity
53
Offensive language
not offensive
Hate speech
not hateful
Attention-grabbing headline
not detected
Known propaganda techniques
not detected
Time-value
short-lived
External references
no external sources
Source diversity
no sources
Affiliate links
no affiliate links
