Nato Chief Backs Trump's Defence Plan
This is a news story, published by BBC, that relates primarily to Rutte news.
Rutte news
For more Rutte news, you can click here:
more Rutte newsNews about Us involvement in foreign conflicts
For more Us involvement in foreign conflicts news, you can click here:
more Us involvement in foreign conflicts newsBBC news
For more news from BBC, you can click here:
more news from BBCAbout the Otherweb
Otherweb, Inc is a public benefit corporation, dedicated to improving the quality of news people consume. We are non-partisan, junk-free, and ad-free. We use artificial intelligence (AI) to remove junk from your news feed, and allow you to select the best politics news, business news, entertainment news, and much more. If you like this article about Us involvement in foreign conflicts, you might also like this article about
core defence spending. We are dedicated to bringing you the highest-quality news, junk-free and ad-free, about your favorite topics. Please come every day to read the latest Nato news, double Nato members news, news about Us involvement in foreign conflicts, and other high-quality news about any topic that interests you. We are working hard to create the best news aggregator on the web, and to put you in control of your news feed - whether you choose to read the latest news through our website, our news app, or our daily newsletter - all free!
current defence plansBBC
•US Politics
US Politics
Nato chief is determined to give Trump a win with 5% defence spending plan

77% Informative
Mark Rutte wants to avoid the scenes of 2016 when Donald Trump berated allies for not spending enough on defence.
Rutte proposed that Nato members spend 5% of GDP on defence - something Trump has openly called for.
The increase would more than double Nato members' current target of spending 2% .
The real test is not the commitment, but whether it delivers, says Rutte .
VR Score
82
Informative language
82
Neutral language
54
Article tone
semi-formal
Language
English
Language complexity
36
Offensive language
not offensive
Hate speech
not hateful
Attention-grabbing headline
not detected
Known propaganda techniques
not detected
Time-value
short-lived
External references
3
Source diversity
1
Affiliate links
no affiliate links