Judiciary Attacks Threaten Presidential Power
This is a Calif. news story, published by PBS, that relates primarily to Kate Shaw news.
Calif. news
For more Calif. news, you can click here:
more Calif. newsKate Shaw news
For more Kate Shaw news, you can click here:
more Kate Shaw newsNews about Us federal policies
For more Us federal policies news, you can click here:
more Us federal policies newsPBS news
For more news from PBS, you can click here:
more news from PBSAbout the Otherweb
Otherweb, Inc is a public benefit corporation, dedicated to improving the quality of news people consume. We are non-partisan, junk-free, and ad-free. We use artificial intelligence (AI) to remove junk from your news feed, and allow you to select the best politics news, business news, entertainment news, and much more. If you like this article about Us federal policies, you might also like this article about
impeachment threats. We are dedicated to bringing you the highest-quality news, junk-free and ad-free, about your favorite topics. Please come every day to read the latest federal judiciary news, hostile rhetoric news, news about Us federal policies, and other high-quality news about any topic that interests you. We are working hard to create the best news aggregator on the web, and to put you in control of your news feed - whether you choose to read the latest news through our website, our news app, or our daily newsletter - all free!
judiciaryPBS
•US Politics
US Politics
WATCH: Law professor addresses unprecedented nature of judicial attacks under Trump administration

72% Informative
Law professor Kate Shaw was testifying before a Senate Judiciary subcommittee hearing on the federal judiciary.
She was asked about whether she's seen historical precedents for attacks by President Donald Trump on judges whose rulings he disagrees with.
Shaw was responding to questions from Sen. Adam Schiff , D- Calif. , who asked her to put the attacks in a broader context.
VR Score
77
Informative language
77
Neutral language
46
Article tone
informal
Language
English
Language complexity
52
Offensive language
not offensive
Hate speech
not hateful
Attention-grabbing headline
not detected
Known propaganda techniques
not detected
Time-value
short-lived
External references
1
Source diversity
1
Affiliate links
no affiliate links