This is a California news story, published by CoinGape, that relates primarily to Bill 1180 news.
For more California news, you can click here:
more California newsFor more Bill 1180 news, you can click here:
more Bill 1180 newsFor more crypto trading & speculation news, you can click here:
more crypto trading & speculation newsFor more news from CoinGape, you can click here:
more news from CoinGapeOtherweb, Inc is a public benefit corporation, dedicated to improving the quality of news people consume. We are non-partisan, junk-free, and ad-free. We use artificial intelligence (AI) to remove junk from your news feed, and allow you to select the best business news, entertainment news, world news, and much more. If you like crypto trading & speculation news, you might also like this article about
California Assembly Bill. We are dedicated to bringing you the highest-quality news, junk-free and ad-free, about your favorite topics. Please come every day to read the latest California Assembly news, crypto regulations news, crypto trading & speculation news, and other high-quality news about any topic that interests you. We are working hard to create the best news aggregator on the web, and to put you in control of your news feed - whether you choose to read the latest news through our website, our news app, or our daily newsletter - all free!
California Blockchain Advocacy CoalitionCoinGape
•Business
Business & Economics
76% Informative
California Assembly has unanimously voted 68 -0 for the Assembly Bill 1180 , which authorizes states to accept Bitcoin payments.
This is a major milestone in permitting crypto payments in the state of California .
The bill is supported by the California Blockchain Advocacy Coalition and aligns with California 's " Bitcoin Rights " legislation.
If the bill passes through the Senate and is signed by California Governor Gavin Newsom , it would become effective on July 1, 2026 .
VR Score
67
Informative language
61
Neutral language
41
Article tone
formal
Language
English
Language complexity
69
Offensive language
not offensive
Hate speech
not hateful
Attention-grabbing headline
not detected
Known propaganda techniques
not detected
Time-value
short-lived
External references
3
Source diversity
3
Affiliate links
no affiliate links