Judge Questions MI5's Neo-Nazi Evidence
This is a England news story, published by BBC, that relates primarily to Chamberlain news.
England news
For more England news, you can click here:
more England newsChamberlain news
For more Chamberlain news, you can click here:
more Chamberlain newsNews about United kingdom politics
For more United kingdom politics news, you can click here:
more United kingdom politics newsBBC news
For more news from BBC, you can click here:
more news from BBCAbout the Otherweb
Otherweb, Inc is a public benefit corporation, dedicated to improving the quality of news people consume. We are non-partisan, junk-free, and ad-free. We use artificial intelligence (AI) to remove junk from your news feed, and allow you to select the best world news, business news, entertainment news, and much more. If you like this article about United kingdom politics, you might also like this article about
MI5 officers. We are dedicated to bringing you the highest-quality news, junk-free and ad-free, about your favorite topics. Please come every day to read the latest MI5 role news, senior MI5 officer news, news about United kingdom politics, and other high-quality news about any topic that interests you. We are working hard to create the best news aggregator on the web, and to put you in control of your news feed - whether you choose to read the latest news through our website, our news app, or our daily newsletter - all free!
MI5 agentBBC
•World
World
MI5 neo-Nazi spy: Judge had 'no confidence' in Security Service's account of false evidence

81% Informative
Mr Justice Chamberlain ordered MI5 to hand over secret documents about the case.
He also said there was a further issue about the "correctness" of new evidence.
Comes four months after BBC revealed MI5 had lied to three courts about a neo- Nazi agent.
The most senior judge in England and Wales , Lady Chief Justice Baroness Sue Carr , and the President of the King's Bench Division Dame Victoria Sharp , will now join him to consider what, if any, action should be taken about MI5 's false evidence.
She had complained about MI5 to a specialist court, the Investigatory Powers Tribunal ( IPT ), and then sought a judicial review in a third court of an IPT ruling that allowed MI5 to apply NCND. It meant that material confirming X 's agent status has been confined to secret hearings, where she was represented by the tribunal's own barristers and her lawyers were excluded..
VR Score
85
Informative language
85
Neutral language
53
Article tone
formal
Language
English
Language complexity
61
Offensive language
not offensive
Hate speech
not hateful
Attention-grabbing headline
not detected
Known propaganda techniques
not detected
Time-value
short-lived
External references
2
Source diversity
1
Affiliate links
no affiliate links