This is a news story, published by Verge, that relates primarily to Perlman news.
For more Perlman news, you can click here:
more Perlman newsFor more Ai research news, you can click here:
more Ai research newsFor more news from Verge, you can click here:
more news from VergeOtherweb, Inc is a public benefit corporation, dedicated to improving the quality of news people consume. We are non-partisan, junk-free, and ad-free. We use artificial intelligence (AI) to remove junk from your news feed, and allow you to select the best tech news, business news, entertainment news, and much more. If you like this article about Ai research, you might also like this article about
many lawyers. We are dedicated to bringing you the highest-quality news, junk-free and ad-free, about your favorite topics. Please come every day to read the latest attorneys news, Most lawyers news, news about Ai research, and other high-quality news about any topic that interests you. We are working hard to create the best news aggregator on the web, and to put you in control of your news feed - whether you choose to read the latest news through our website, our news app, or our daily newsletter - all free!
legal researchVerge
•Technology
Technology
85% Informative
Lawyers are getting in trouble for submitting filings with AI -generated hallucinations.
ChatGPT is a large language model (LLM) used to help them with legal research (or worse, writing) The lawyer is none the wiser until the judge or opposing counsel points out their mistake.
Legal databases and research systems like Westlaw are incorporating AI services.
ChatGPT and LexisNexis are among the tools used by lawyers to help with legal research and writing.
But like anyone using AI tools, lawyers who rely on them need to be careful to check the work they produce.
The American Bar Association has issued guidance on attorneys’ use of AI tools.
Lawyers should also weigh the confidentiality risks of inputting information relating to their cases into LLMs, it states.
Perlman is bullish on lawyers’ use of AI .
Others, including one of the judges who sanctioned lawyers for submitting a filing full of AI -generated hallucinations, are skeptical.
VR Score
87
Informative language
85
Neutral language
71
Article tone
informal
Language
English
Language complexity
54
Offensive language
not offensive
Hate speech
not hateful
Attention-grabbing headline
not detected
Known propaganda techniques
not detected
Time-value
medium-lived
External references
9
Source diversity
9
Affiliate links
no affiliate links
