Kennedy Criticizes Medical Journals
This is a news story, published by The New Republic, that relates primarily to Robert F. Kennedy Jr. news.
Robert F. Kennedy Jr. news
For more Robert F. Kennedy Jr. news, you can click here:
more Robert F. Kennedy Jr. newsNews about health policy
For more health policy news, you can click here:
more health policy newsThe New Republic news
For more news from The New Republic, you can click here:
more news from The New RepublicAbout the Otherweb
Otherweb, Inc is a public benefit corporation, dedicated to improving the quality of news people consume. We are non-partisan, junk-free, and ad-free. We use artificial intelligence (AI) to remove junk from your news feed, and allow you to select the best health news, business news, entertainment news, and much more. If you like this article about health policy, you might also like this article about
medical journals. We are dedicated to bringing you the highest-quality news, junk-free and ad-free, about your favorite topics. Please come every day to read the latest journal Science news, more journals news, news about health policy, and other high-quality news about any topic that interests you. We are working hard to create the best news aggregator on the web, and to put you in control of your news feed - whether you choose to read the latest news through our website, our news app, or our daily newsletter - all free!
own medical journalThe New Republic
•Health
Health
RFK Jr. Threatens Wild Ban on How NIH Scientists Can Share Work

80% Informative
Robert F. Kennedy Jr. doesn’t want government scientists to publish their work in leading medical journals.
The secretary of health and human services accused the journals of being “corrupt” and in the pocket of major pharmaceutical companies.
The Justice Department sent threatening letters to medical journals earlier this month accusing them of partisanship.
VR Score
79
Informative language
76
Neutral language
54
Article tone
semi-formal
Language
English
Language complexity
62
Offensive language
possibly offensive
Hate speech
not hateful
Attention-grabbing headline
not detected
Known propaganda techniques
detected
Time-value
short-lived
External references
78
Source diversity
20
Affiliate links
no affiliate links