This is a news story, published by Condé Nast, that relates primarily to Frida Ghitis: news.
For more Frida Ghitis: news, you can click here:
more Frida Ghitis: newsFor more SCOTUS news, you can click here:
more SCOTUS newsFor more news from Condé Nast, you can click here:
more news from Condé NastOtherweb, Inc is a public benefit corporation, dedicated to improving the quality of news people consume. We are non-partisan, junk-free, and ad-free. We use artificial intelligence (AI) to remove junk from your news feed, and allow you to select the best politics news, business news, entertainment news, and much more. If you like this article about SCOTUS, you might also like this article about
birthright citizenship. We are dedicated to bringing you the highest-quality news, junk-free and ad-free, about your favorite topics. Please come every day to read the latest Supreme Court precedents news, nationwide injunctions news, news about SCOTUS, and other high-quality news about any topic that interests you. We are working hard to create the best news aggregator on the web, and to put you in control of your news feed - whether you choose to read the latest news through our website, our news app, or our daily newsletter - all free!
citizenship caseCondé Nast
•US Politics
US Politics
63% Informative
The Supreme Court heard arguments in the birthright-citizenship case at the Supreme Court on Thursday .
Frida Ghitis: The Trump Administration has unleashed a torrent of unconstitutional executive orders and other questionable legal actions.
She says the Administration is trying to stop lower-court judges from issuing “nationwide injunctions” She says it's a problem for Administrations of both parties, both Democrats and Republicans , but the first months of the second Trump Administration have made that pace look leisurely.
Justice Elena Kagan : Citizenship is, by definition, a national issue.
It makes little sense to have a patchwork nation in which children born in one state are citizens.
No Justice, not even the most conservative, expressed a hint of sympathy for eliminating it.
By the end of the session, it seemed as though the Justices might be thinking that they had blundered by getting sucked into the injunction debate.
VR Score
73
Informative language
76
Neutral language
23
Article tone
semi-formal
Language
English
Language complexity
60
Offensive language
not offensive
Hate speech
not hateful
Attention-grabbing headline
not detected
Known propaganda techniques
detected
Time-value
short-lived
External references
no external sources
Source diversity
no sources
Affiliate links
no affiliate links
