Boogers vs. Earwax Debate
This is a news story, published by Upworthy, that relates primarily to Quora news.
Quora news
For more Quora news, you can click here:
more Quora newsbiology news
For more biology news, you can click here:
more biology newsUpworthy news
For more news from Upworthy, you can click here:
more news from UpworthyAbout the Otherweb
Otherweb, Inc is a public benefit corporation, dedicated to improving the quality of news people consume. We are non-partisan, junk-free, and ad-free. We use artificial intelligence (AI) to remove junk from your news feed, and allow you to select the best science news, business news, entertainment news, and much more. If you like biology news, you might also like this article about
nose gross. We are dedicated to bringing you the highest-quality news, junk-free and ad-free, about your favorite topics. Please come every day to read the latest nose news, ear news, biology news, and other high-quality news about any topic that interests you. We are working hard to create the best news aggregator on the web, and to put you in control of your news feed - whether you choose to read the latest news through our website, our news app, or our daily newsletter - all free!
boogersUpworthy
•Science
Science
After an epic, unhinged debate about boogers vs. earwax, real doctors set the record straight

54% Informative
A Quora user asked, "Why is it okay to pick your ears as opposed to picking your nose?" Experts say both are "a protective way of stopping bacteria, and other things you don’t want, helping move it out" Business Insider: "Sorry to say, there's zero scientific evidence to support any health benefits from eating your boogers".
Eating boogers can prime your immune system to detect germs, a professor says.
But experts say it's not likely that eating it would offer much additional immune system support.
Experts say picking at any part of your body does more harm than good, no matter how delicious some find it.
VR Score
46
Informative language
41
Neutral language
14
Article tone
informal
Language
English
Language complexity
42
Offensive language
possibly offensive
Hate speech
not hateful
Attention-grabbing headline
not detected
Known propaganda techniques
not detected
Time-value
medium-lived
External references
no external sources
Source diversity
no sources
Affiliate links
no affiliate links