Ontario Hospitals' $9B Private Staff
This is a news story, published by Global News, that relates primarily to Andrew Longhurst news.
Andrew Longhurst news
For more Andrew Longhurst news, you can click here:
more Andrew Longhurst newsNews about health policy
For more health policy news, you can click here:
more health policy newsGlobal News news
For more news from Global News, you can click here:
more news from Global NewsAbout the Otherweb
Otherweb, Inc is a public benefit corporation, dedicated to improving the quality of news people consume. We are non-partisan, junk-free, and ad-free. We use artificial intelligence (AI) to remove junk from your news feed, and allow you to select the best health news, business news, entertainment news, and much more. If you like this article about health policy, you might also like this article about
public hospital spending. We are dedicated to bringing you the highest-quality news, junk-free and ad-free, about your favorite topics. Please come every day to read the latest private agency staff news, Ontario hospital corporations news, news about health policy, and other high-quality news about any topic that interests you. We are working hard to create the best news aggregator on the web, and to put you in control of your news feed - whether you choose to read the latest news through our website, our news app, or our daily newsletter - all free!
hospital budgetsGlobal News
•Health
Health
Ontario hospitals spent over $9B on agency staff over 10 years, study finds | Globalnews.ca

74% Informative
Ontario hospitals spent more than $9 billion on staff from for-profit agencies in a 10-year period, study finds.
Study author Andrew Longhurst recommends phasing out staffing agencies over three years and ultimately banning them.
Rural and northern hospitals in particular rely on agency staff, and Longhurst ’s study shows the issue of associated cost has become more acute.
VR Score
82
Informative language
86
Neutral language
57
Article tone
informal
Language
English
Language complexity
56
Offensive language
not offensive
Hate speech
not hateful
Attention-grabbing headline
not detected
Known propaganda techniques
not detected
Time-value
short-lived
External references
no external sources
Source diversity
no sources
Affiliate links
no affiliate links