This is a Cleveland news story, published by The Indianapolis Star, that relates primarily to Pacers news.
For more Cleveland news, you can click here:
more Cleveland newsFor more basketball news, you can click here:
more basketball newsFor more news from The Indianapolis Star, you can click here:
more news from The Indianapolis StarOtherweb, Inc is a public benefit corporation, dedicated to improving the quality of news people consume. We are non-partisan, junk-free, and ad-free. We use artificial intelligence (AI) to remove junk from your news feed, and allow you to select the best sport news, business news, entertainment news, and much more. If you like basketball news, you might also like this article about
Cavs. We are dedicated to bringing you the highest-quality news, junk-free and ad-free, about your favorite topics. Please come every day to read the latest Pacers news, seed Pacers news, basketball news, and other high-quality news about any topic that interests you. We are working hard to create the best news aggregator on the web, and to put you in control of your news feed - whether you choose to read the latest news through our website, our news app, or our daily newsletter - all free!
seed CavsThe Indianapolis Star
•Sports
Sports
83% Informative
The Pacers led 80 -39 at the break and most of the second half in garbage time.
They scored 38 points in the first quarter and were even better in the second period.
The Pacers scored 42 points on 16-of-24 shooting in second period for 1.70 points per possession.
Game 5 is 7 p.m. , Tuesday at Rocket Arena in Cleveland .
The Cavs scored 23 points in the first quarter , but but were 4-of-15 from the floor.
In the second quarter they managed just 16 points, but only 16 in the third quarter .
At the break, they were 8- of-32 from the.
floor, 5 -of19 from 3 with three assists against 14 turnovers for 0.77 points per possession.
The game was never in doubt after halftime.
VR Score
90
Informative language
94
Neutral language
21
Article tone
formal
Language
English
Language complexity
19
Offensive language
not offensive
Hate speech
not hateful
Attention-grabbing headline
not detected
Known propaganda techniques
not detected
Time-value
short-lived
External references
4
Source diversity
3
Affiliate links
no affiliate links
