This is a F1 news story, published by Motorsport.com: F1 News, MotoGP, NASCAR, Rallying and more, that relates primarily to FIA news.
For more F1 news, you can click here:
more F1 newsFor more autoracing news, you can click here:
more autoracing newsFor more news from Motorsport.com: F1 News, MotoGP, NASCAR, Rallying and more, you can click here:
more news from Motorsport.com: F1 News, MotoGP, NASCAR, Rallying and moreOtherweb, Inc is a public benefit corporation, dedicated to improving the quality of news people consume. We are non-partisan, junk-free, and ad-free. We use artificial intelligence (AI) to remove junk from your news feed, and allow you to select the best sport news, business news, entertainment news, and much more. If you like autoracing news, you might also like this article about
F1 teams. We are dedicated to bringing you the highest-quality news, junk-free and ad-free, about your favorite topics. Please come every day to read the latest F1 stakeholders news, Renault news, autoracing news, and other high-quality news about any topic that interests you. We are working hard to create the best news aggregator on the web, and to put you in control of your news feed - whether you choose to read the latest news through our website, our news app, or our daily newsletter - all free!
F1 team bossesMotorsport.com: F1 News, MotoGP, NASCAR, Rallying and more
•Sports
Sports
70% Informative
The FIA is factoring a catch-up mechanism into the next rules framework.
Mercedes had been ploughing resources into its project longer and more intensively than anyone else.
The result was almost five seasons of total dominance while rivals struggled to catch up.
The challenge is going to come in threading such a mechanism through F1 ’s financial restrictions.
F1 Commission agrees on principle of a catch-up mechanism for the 2026 engine rules package.
But the specifics had to be booted up the road after Saudi Arabian Grand Prix.
Most likely outcome of this will be a sliding scale of dyno testing and engine budget cap concessions depending on scale of performance and reliability disparities.
VR Score
75
Informative language
76
Neutral language
68
Article tone
formal
Language
English
Language complexity
57
Offensive language
not offensive
Hate speech
not hateful
Attention-grabbing headline
not detected
Known propaganda techniques
not detected
Time-value
short-lived
External references
no external sources
Source diversity
no sources
Affiliate links
no affiliate links
