Eye-tracking reveals date preferences
This is a Minnesota news story, published by MailOnline, that relates primarily to the Mayo Clinic news.
Minnesota news
For more Minnesota news, you can click here:
more Minnesota newsmen's health news
For more men's health news, you can click here:
more men's health newsMailOnline news
For more news from MailOnline, you can click here:
more news from MailOnlineAbout the Otherweb
Otherweb, Inc is a public benefit corporation, dedicated to improving the quality of news people consume. We are non-partisan, junk-free, and ad-free. We use artificial intelligence (AI) to remove junk from your news feed, and allow you to select the best health news, business news, entertainment news, and much more. If you like men's health news, you might also like this article about
attractiveness. We are dedicated to bringing you the highest-quality news, junk-free and ad-free, about your favorite topics. Please come every day to read the latest high attractiveness rating news, gaze news, men's health news, and other high-quality news about any topic that interests you. We are working hard to create the best news aggregator on the web, and to put you in control of your news feed - whether you choose to read the latest news through our website, our news app, or our daily newsletter - all free!
lower attractiveness ratingsMailOnline
•Health
Health
Your date fancies you if they're looking at THIS part of your face

80% Informative
Researchers from the Mayo Clinic in Minnesota recruited 154 adults to take part in their study.
They used eye-tracking technology to monitor where people looked while viewing a set of photographs.
They asked people to rate how attractive they found them, and their findings revealed that when people stared longer at particular areas of the face they were more likely to rate the picture as attractive.
Overall, for faces rated as more attractive, participants tended to spend more time looking at the mouth, nose and cheeks an area called the central triangle.
VR Score
80
Informative language
81
Neutral language
12
Article tone
informal
Language
English
Language complexity
49
Offensive language
possibly offensive
Hate speech
not hateful
Attention-grabbing headline
not detected
Known propaganda techniques
not detected
Time-value
medium-lived
External references
8
Source diversity
5
Affiliate links
no affiliate links