Trump Administration Seeks DOGE Access
This is a US news story, published by Ars Technica, that relates primarily to John Sauer news.
US news
For more US news, you can click here:
more US newsJohn Sauer news
For more John Sauer news, you can click here:
more John Sauer newsNews about SCOTUS
For more SCOTUS news, you can click here:
more SCOTUS newsArs Technica news
For more news from Ars Technica, you can click here:
more news from Ars TechnicaAbout the Otherweb
Otherweb, Inc is a public benefit corporation, dedicated to improving the quality of news people consume. We are non-partisan, junk-free, and ad-free. We use artificial intelligence (AI) to remove junk from your news feed, and allow you to select the best politics news, business news, entertainment news, and much more. If you like this article about SCOTUS, you might also like this article about
Social Security Administration. We are dedicated to bringing you the highest-quality news, junk-free and ad-free, about your favorite topics. Please come every day to read the latest SSA news, appeals court news, news about SCOTUS, and other high-quality news about any topic that interests you. We are working hard to create the best news aggregator on the web, and to put you in control of your news feed - whether you choose to read the latest news through our website, our news app, or our daily newsletter - all free!
SSA DOGE TeamArs Technica
•US Politics
US Politics
After two court losses, DOGE asks Supreme Court for Social Security data access

81% Informative
A lower-court order that prohibited DOGE 's access to Social Security records is causing "irreparable harm to the executive branch," US Solicitor General John Sauer wrote in the appeal.
The case was filed by the American Federation of State , County and Municipal Employees and the Alliance for Retired Americans .
Chief Justice John Roberts asked them to file a response to the US by May 12 .
VR Score
85
Informative language
83
Neutral language
90
Article tone
formal
Language
English
Language complexity
78
Offensive language
not offensive
Hate speech
not hateful
Attention-grabbing headline
not detected
Known propaganda techniques
not detected
Time-value
short-lived
External references
2
Source diversity
1
Affiliate links
no affiliate links