Police chiefs to sack unfit officers
This is a news story, published by BBC, that relates primarily to Yvette Cooper news.
Yvette Cooper news
For more Yvette Cooper news, you can click here:
more Yvette Cooper newsNews about Us police misconduct
For more Us police misconduct news, you can click here:
more Us police misconduct newsBBC news
For more news from BBC, you can click here:
more news from BBCAbout the Otherweb
Otherweb, Inc is a public benefit corporation, dedicated to improving the quality of news people consume. We are non-partisan, junk-free, and ad-free. We use artificial intelligence (AI) to remove junk from your news feed, and allow you to select the best politics news, business news, entertainment news, and much more. If you like this article about Us police misconduct, you might also like this article about
police vetting procedures. We are dedicated to bringing you the highest-quality news, junk-free and ad-free, about your favorite topics. Please come every day to read the latest committed officers news, Police chiefs news, news about Us police misconduct, and other high-quality news about any topic that interests you. We are working hard to create the best news aggregator on the web, and to put you in control of your news feed - whether you choose to read the latest news through our website, our news app, or our daily newsletter - all free!
current Met Police vetting modelBBC
•US Politics
US Politics
Police chiefs granted powers to remove officers unfit for duty

79% Informative
Home Secretary Yvette Cooper has called the reforms "essential" in the government's programme to "restore confidence in policing" Calls for a change to police vetting procedures began after an independent report into the murder of Sarah Everard by police officer Wayne Couzens in 2021 .
Currently, those who do not pass vetting checks can stay in their force on full pay despite not being allowed to undertake a public-facing role.
VR Score
83
Informative language
83
Neutral language
45
Article tone
semi-formal
Language
English
Language complexity
62
Offensive language
possibly offensive
Hate speech
not hateful
Attention-grabbing headline
not detected
Known propaganda techniques
not detected
Time-value
short-lived
External references
7
Source diversity
1
Affiliate links
no affiliate links
Small business owner?