Leaked Document Debunks Eat-Lancet Study
This is a news story, published by Guardian, that relates primarily to Red Flag news.
agriculture news
For more agriculture news, you can click here:
more agriculture newsGuardian news
For more news from Guardian, you can click here:
more news from GuardianAbout the Otherweb
Otherweb, Inc is a public benefit corporation, dedicated to improving the quality of news people consume. We are non-partisan, junk-free, and ad-free. We use artificial intelligence (AI) to remove junk from your news feed, and allow you to select the best business news, entertainment news, world news, and much more. If you like agriculture news, you might also like this article about
global red meat eating. We are dedicated to bringing you the highest-quality news, junk-free and ad-free, about your favorite topics. Please come every day to read the latest Animal Agriculture Alliance news, planetary health diet news, agriculture news, and other high-quality news about any topic that interests you. We are working hard to create the best news aggregator on the web, and to put you in control of your news feed - whether you choose to read the latest news through our website, our news app, or our daily newsletter - all free!
environmental advocacy group EatGuardian
•Business
Business & Economics
PR campaign may have fuelled food study backlash, leaked document shows

76% Informative
Leaked document shows vested interests may have been behind mud-slinging’ PR campaign to discredit study.
PR firm Red Flag represented Animal Agriculture Alliance , a meat and dairy industry coalition set up to protect the sector against “emerging threats’ The report recommended that if global red meat eating was cut by 50% , the planetary health diet’ would provide nutritious food to all while tackling the harms caused by animal agriculture.
Red Flag turned Eat-Lancet into a culture-war issue, expert says.
Online backlash was one of the earliest examples of a culture war around dietary change.
Study of social media posts in months after the report’s publication found opponents used misinformation, conspiracy theories, and personal attacks’ to discredit the work.
VR Score
72
Informative language
68
Neutral language
47
Article tone
semi-formal
Language
English
Language complexity
57
Offensive language
not offensive
Hate speech
not hateful
Attention-grabbing headline
not detected
Known propaganda techniques
not detected
Time-value
short-lived
External references
13
Source diversity
9
Affiliate links
no affiliate links
Small business owner?