US DOGE Service-DOL Protocols
This is a news story, published by Wired, that relates primarily to DOL news.
News about labor activism
For more labor activism news, you can click here:
more labor activism newsWired news
For more news from Wired, you can click here:
more news from WiredAbout the Otherweb
Otherweb, Inc is a public benefit corporation, dedicated to improving the quality of news people consume. We are non-partisan, junk-free, and ad-free. We use artificial intelligence (AI) to remove junk from your news feed, and allow you to select the best politics news, business news, entertainment news, and much more. If you like this article about labor activism, you might also like this article about
US DOGE Service. We are dedicated to bringing you the highest-quality news, junk-free and ad-free, about your favorite topics. Please come every day to read the latest DOGE salaries news, US Digital Service news, news about labor activism, and other high-quality news about any topic that interests you. We are working hard to create the best news aggregator on the web, and to put you in control of your news feed - whether you choose to read the latest news through our website, our news app, or our daily newsletter - all free!
DOGE affiliatesWired
•US Politics
US Politics
US DOGE Service Agreement With Department of Labor Shows $1.3 Million Fee—and Details Its Mission

77% Informative
An agreement between the US DOGE Service ( USDS ) and the Department of Labor ( DOL ) provides significant insight into the evolving working protocols between the two agencies.
The agreement calls for the DOL to reimburse the USDS up to $1.3 million for work done by four affiliates, or “a slightly different number,” over an 18-month period.
Terms on the interagency agreement require DOGE to provide 24 hours notice before “seeking access to each DOL system” USDS workers are also required to report to DOL supervisors.
The DOL did not respond to WIRED’s requests for comment, which included questions about whether the agreement has been signed or enacted.
VR Score
76
Informative language
76
Neutral language
6
Article tone
formal
Language
English
Language complexity
65
Offensive language
not offensive
Hate speech
not hateful
Attention-grabbing headline
not detected
Known propaganda techniques
not detected
Time-value
short-lived
External references
4
Source diversity
4
Affiliate links
no affiliate links
Small business owner?