This is a news story, published by Condé Nast, that relates primarily to Sarah Wynn-Williams news.
For more Sarah Wynn-Williams news, you can click here:
more Sarah Wynn-Williams newsFor more Ai policy and regulations news, you can click here:
more Ai policy and regulations newsFor more news from Condé Nast, you can click here:
more news from Condé NastOtherweb, Inc is a public benefit corporation, dedicated to improving the quality of news people consume. We are non-partisan, junk-free, and ad-free. We use artificial intelligence (AI) to remove junk from your news feed, and allow you to select the best tech news, business news, entertainment news, and much more. If you like this article about Ai policy and regulations, you might also like this article about
former Facebook executive. We are dedicated to bringing you the highest-quality news, junk-free and ad-free, about your favorite topics. Please come every day to read the latest alleged role news, Sarah Wynn news, news about Ai policy and regulations, and other high-quality news about any topic that interests you. We are working hard to create the best news aggregator on the web, and to put you in control of your news feed - whether you choose to read the latest news through our website, our news app, or our daily newsletter - all free!
Meta spokesperson Andy StoneCondé Nast
•Technology
Technology
66% Informative
Sarah Wynn-Williams , Facebook ’s former director of global public policy, recently published an explosive tell-all memoir about her time at the company Careless People .
She plans to accuse Meta of working “hand in glove’ with the Chinese Communist Party to construct and test custom-built censorship tools that silenced and censored their critics.
Sarah Wynn-Williams will brief a Senate subcommittee on Wednesday .
She plans to accuse Meta of working “hand in glove’ with the Chinese Communist Party to construct and test custom-built censorship tools that silenced and censored critics.
The arbitrator barred her from promoting the book or “amplifying or repeating” any “disparaging, critical or otherwise detrimental comments”.
VR Score
61
Informative language
60
Neutral language
51
Article tone
formal
Language
English
Language complexity
67
Offensive language
possibly offensive
Hate speech
not hateful
Attention-grabbing headline
detected
Known propaganda techniques
not detected
Time-value
short-lived
External references
6
Source diversity
4
Affiliate links
no affiliate links
Small business owner?
