This is a Gunn news story, published by Home, that relates primarily to Paul Chiang news.
For more Gunn news, you can click here:
more Gunn newsFor more Paul Chiang news, you can click here:
more Paul Chiang newsFor more Us campaigns & elections news, you can click here:
more Us campaigns & elections newsFor more news from Home, you can click here:
more news from HomeOtherweb, Inc is a public benefit corporation, dedicated to improving the quality of news people consume. We are non-partisan, junk-free, and ad-free. We use artificial intelligence (AI) to remove junk from your news feed, and allow you to select the best politics news, business news, entertainment news, and much more. If you like this article about Us campaigns & elections, you might also like this article about
toxic candidates. We are dedicated to bringing you the highest-quality news, junk-free and ad-free, about your favorite topics. Please come every day to read the latest Liberal candidate news, federal candidates news, news about Us campaigns & elections, and other high-quality news about any topic that interests you. We are working hard to create the best news aggregator on the web, and to put you in control of your news feed - whether you choose to read the latest news through our website, our news app, or our daily newsletter - all free!
federal election campaignHome
•US Politics
US Politics
71% Informative
Liberal Paul Chiang , Conservative Aaron Gunn and Conservative candidates have been in hot water for years .
Liberal leader Mark Carney defended Chiang and Gunn , who were both predicted to win.
Why were both leaders willing to risk reputational damage from candidates whose untempered comments caused pain and offence to swaths of Canadians ?.
Poilievre likely feels indebted to Gunn whose video stream amounts to a two-year campaign to elect the Conservative leader.
It’s also possible that deep down, he sympathizes with Gunn because of his own experience.
Standing behind candidates who express reprehensible views smacks of political expediency and feeds public cynicism.
VR Score
70
Informative language
66
Neutral language
20
Article tone
semi-formal
Language
English
Language complexity
52
Offensive language
possibly offensive
Hate speech
not hateful
Attention-grabbing headline
not detected
Known propaganda techniques
not detected
Time-value
short-lived
External references
19
Source diversity
10
Affiliate links
no affiliate links
Small business owner?
