This is a news story, published by USA Today, that relates primarily to Claudia Wilken news.
For more Claudia Wilken news, you can click here:
more Claudia Wilken newsFor more other sports news, you can click here:
more other sports newsFor more news from USA Today, you can click here:
more news from USA TodayOtherweb, Inc is a public benefit corporation, dedicated to improving the quality of news people consume. We are non-partisan, junk-free, and ad-free. We use artificial intelligence (AI) to remove junk from your news feed, and allow you to select the best sport news, business news, entertainment news, and much more. If you like other sports news, you might also like this article about
NCAA settlement hearing. We are dedicated to bringing you the highest-quality news, junk-free and ad-free, about your favorite topics. Please come every day to read the latest NCAA compliance news, sport scholarship limits news, other sports news, and other high-quality news about any topic that interests you. We are working hard to create the best news aggregator on the web, and to put you in control of your news feed - whether you choose to read the latest news through our website, our news app, or our daily newsletter - all free!
future NCAA distributionsUSA Today
•Sports
Sports
77% Informative
Judge Claudia Wilken is scheduled to conduct a hearing Monday concerning final approval of the proposed multi-billion-dollar settlements of three athlete-compensation antitrust cases against the NCAA and the Power Five conferences.
The deal would include nearly $2.8 billion in damages that would go to current and former athletes over 10 years .
Among other changes, NCAA leaders would seek to engineer rules changes eliminating sport-by-sport scholarship limits and replacing them with a new set of roster-size limits.
If the settlement is approved, schools will be able to move forward with plans to start paying athletes for use of their NIL .
The 10-year window for payment of the damages award, including what stands to be as much as $775 million in attorneys’ fees and costs for the plaintiffs, would begin.
The case brought on behalf of athletes who opted out could continue.
VR Score
86
Informative language
90
Neutral language
78
Article tone
informal
Language
English
Language complexity
53
Offensive language
not offensive
Hate speech
not hateful
Attention-grabbing headline
not detected
Known propaganda techniques
not detected
Time-value
short-lived
External references
no external sources
Source diversity
no sources
Affiliate links
no affiliate links
Small business owner?
