Van Dijk's "penalty" appeal rejected
This is a news story, published by Telegraph, that relates primarily to Virgil van Dijk news.
Virgil van Dijk news
For more Virgil van Dijk news, you can click here:
more Virgil van Dijk newssoccer news
For more soccer news, you can click here:
more soccer newsTelegraph news
For more news from Telegraph, you can click here:
more news from TelegraphAbout the Otherweb
Otherweb, Inc is a public benefit corporation, dedicated to improving the quality of news people consume. We are non-partisan, junk-free, and ad-free. We use artificial intelligence (AI) to remove junk from your news feed, and allow you to select the best sport news, business news, entertainment news, and much more. If you like soccer news, you might also like this article about
penalty kick. We are dedicated to bringing you the highest-quality news, junk-free and ad-free, about your favorite topics. Please come every day to read the latest Professional Game Match Officials Limited news, referee news, soccer news, and other high-quality news about any topic that interests you. We are working hard to create the best news aggregator on the web, and to put you in control of your news feed - whether you choose to read the latest news through our website, our news app, or our daily newsletter - all free!
penaltyTelegraph
•Sports
Sports
Seven Virgil van Dijk incidents that fuel preferential treatment claims

61% Informative
Virgil van Dijk clattered into Fulham 's Rodrigo Muniz in a wincing body check.
VAR checks quickly dismissed two appeals, with officials also declaring that a challenge by Caoimhín Kelleher on Andreas Pereira in the same move was “a coming together and not a reckless action’s.
Keith Hackett , the former head of Professional Game Match Officials Limited , has been asked to re-referee seven incidents for which opposition supporters and some managers have claimed Van Dijk should have seen red.
VR Score
48
Informative language
38
Neutral language
12
Article tone
formal
Language
English
Language complexity
47
Offensive language
possibly offensive
Hate speech
not hateful
Attention-grabbing headline
not detected
Known propaganda techniques
not detected
Time-value
short-lived
External references
15
Source diversity
2
Affiliate links
no affiliate links
Small business owner?