This is a Michigan news story, published by ESPN, that relates primarily to Shemar Stewart news.
For more Michigan news, you can click here:
more Michigan newsFor more Shemar Stewart news, you can click here:
more Shemar Stewart newsFor more football news, you can click here:
more football newsFor more news from ESPN, you can click here:
more news from ESPNOtherweb, Inc is a public benefit corporation, dedicated to improving the quality of news people consume. We are non-partisan, junk-free, and ad-free. We use artificial intelligence (AI) to remove junk from your news feed, and allow you to select the best sport news, business news, entertainment news, and much more. If you like football news, you might also like this article about
future NFL potential. We are dedicated to bringing you the highest-quality news, junk-free and ad-free, about your favorite topics. Please come every day to read the latest round draft pick news, Defensive Rookie news, football news, and other high-quality news about any topic that interests you. We are working hard to create the best news aggregator on the web, and to put you in control of your news feed - whether you choose to read the latest news through our website, our news app, or our daily newsletter - all free!
NFL draftESPN
•Sports
Sports
82% Informative
Texas A&M's Shemar Stewart is the No. 25 prospect on ESPN analyst Mel Kiper Jr.'s Big Board .
He's the highest-rated player in this year 's balancing act of future NFL potential with on-field production.
"Sometimes the stats don't tell the whole story," Stewart said at the combine.
Kiper: "You value upside because you want growth, but we don't have a farm system".
Travon Walker was one of the draft's most prominent potential-vs.-production debates of the past decade .
Walker had 9.5 sacks and 11 tackles for loss combined in three college seasons.
Walker ended up being the No. 1 pick, with the Jaguars choosing him over Michigan 's Aidan Hutchinson .
VR Score
90
Informative language
93
Neutral language
48
Article tone
informal
Language
English
Language complexity
26
Offensive language
not offensive
Hate speech
not hateful
Attention-grabbing headline
not detected
Known propaganda techniques
not detected
Time-value
short-lived
External references
2
Source diversity
2
Affiliate links
no affiliate links
