Poll: Signal Attack Discussion Wrong

This is a Yemen news story, published by MSN, that relates primarily to Houthis news.

Yemen news

For more Yemen news, you can click here:

more Yemen news

Houthis news

For more Houthis news, you can click here:

more Houthis news

News about Us federal elections

For more Us federal elections news, you can click here:

more Us federal elections news

MSN news

For more news from MSN, you can click here:

more news from MSN

About the Otherweb

Otherweb, Inc is a public benefit corporation, dedicated to improving the quality of news people consume. We are non-partisan, junk-free, and ad-free. We use artificial intelligence (AI) to remove junk from your news feed, and allow you to select the best politics news, business news, entertainment news, and much more. If you like this article about Us federal elections, you might also like this article about

national security adviser Mike Waltz

. We are dedicated to bringing you the highest-quality news, junk-free and ad-free, about your favorite topics. Please come every day to read the latest National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard news, national security leaders news, news about Us federal elections, and other high-quality news about any topic that interests you. We are working hard to create the best news aggregator on the web, and to put you in control of your news feed - whether you choose to read the latest news through our website, our news app, or our daily newsletter - all free!

attack plans

The Hill

•

US Politics

Majority of voters say it was wrong to hold Signal app discussion: Poll

Summary

Nutrition label

75% Informative

A majority of voters say holding a discussion of plans to attack the Houthis in Yemen on the messaging app Signal was wrong.

The Harvard CAPS/ Harris poll found that 60 percent believe using Signal for the discussion was wrong, including 73 percent of Democrats , 65 percent of independents and 43 percent of Republicans .

The results come after The Atlantic published messages from the chat that the outlet’s editor-in-chief Jeffrey Goldberg was added to earlier this month in which several members of the national security team discussed details of the strike.

VR Score

Informative language

Neutral language

Article tone

formal

Language

English

Language complexity

Offensive language

not offensive

Hate speech

not hateful