Courts Challenge Trump's Foreign Policy

This is a news story, published by Washington Examiner, that relates primarily to McCarthy news.

McCarthy news

For more McCarthy news, you can click here:

more McCarthy news

News about Us involvement in foreign conflicts

For more Us involvement in foreign conflicts news, you can click here:

more Us involvement in foreign conflicts news

Washington Examiner news

For more news from Washington Examiner, you can click here:

more news from Washington Examiner

About the Otherweb

Otherweb, Inc is a public benefit corporation, dedicated to improving the quality of news people consume. We are non-partisan, junk-free, and ad-free. We use artificial intelligence (AI) to remove junk from your news feed, and allow you to select the best politics news, business news, entertainment news, and much more. If you like this article about Us involvement in foreign conflicts, you might also like this article about

Judiciary

. We are dedicated to bringing you the highest-quality news, junk-free and ad-free, about your favorite topics. Please come every day to read the latest modern American courts news, judicial skepticism news, news about Us involvement in foreign conflicts, and other high-quality news about any topic that interests you. We are working hard to create the best news aggregator on the web, and to put you in control of your news feed - whether you choose to read the latest news through our website, our news app, or our daily newsletter - all free!

judicial process

Washington Examiner

•

US Politics

Trump, courts battle over who has national security authority

Summary

Nutrition label

75% Informative

Federal courts are increasingly stepping into disputes the Trump administration argues fall squarely under the president’s foreign policy and national security authority.

Judges have been pushing back, asserting their own authority to evaluate whether these claims hold up under the Constitution and statutory law.

The scale of court intervention during Trump 's presidency is also historically significant.

The courts have been less reluctant to wade into matters of war, national security, and foreign policy, says McCarthy .

McCarthy : "When the courts are used by people who don’t like what the President is doing to immiserate the president, that seems to be steering the constitutional balance way too far in the direction of the judiciary.”.

VR Score

Informative language

Neutral language

Article tone

formal

Language

English

Language complexity

Offensive language

not offensive

Hate speech

not hateful