World Leaders Discuss Biodiversity Funding
This is a Rome news story, published by MSN, that relates primarily to the World Wildlife Fund news.
Rome news
For more Rome news, you can click here:
more Rome newspets, animals & wildlife news
For more pets, animals & wildlife news, you can click here:
more pets, animals & wildlife newsMSN news
For more news from MSN, you can click here:
more news from MSNAbout the Otherweb
Otherweb, Inc is a public benefit corporation, dedicated to improving the quality of news people consume. We are non-partisan, junk-free, and ad-free. We use artificial intelligence (AI) to remove junk from your news feed, and allow you to select the best entertainment news, business news, world news, and much more. If you like pets, animals & wildlife news, you might also like this article about
biodiversity funding. We are dedicated to bringing you the highest-quality news, junk-free and ad-free, about your favorite topics. Please come every day to read the latest Funding conservation news, biodiversity crisis news, pets, animals & wildlife news, and other high-quality news about any topic that interests you. We are working hard to create the best news aggregator on the web, and to put you in control of your news feed - whether you choose to read the latest news through our website, our news app, or our daily newsletter - all free!
World Wildlife FundThe Cool Down
•Entertainment
Entertainment
Global leaders discuss $200 billion proposal with long-term economic consequences: 'This could be a historic moment'
79% Informative
Leaders are meeting in Rome to determine how to fund the ambitious goal of halting nature loss by 2030 .
Proposed is a $200 billion annual investment in biodiversity conservation that could shape environmental and economic policies for decades to come.
According to the World Wildlife Fund , global wildlife populations have plummeted by 73% since 1970 .
VR Score
78
Informative language
77
Neutral language
4
Article tone
informal
Language
English
Language complexity
58
Offensive language
not offensive
Hate speech
not hateful
Attention-grabbing headline
not detected
Known propaganda techniques
not detected
Time-value
short-lived
External references
17
Source diversity
7
Affiliate links
no affiliate links