This is a news story, published by Condé Nast, that relates primarily to Radhika Jones news.
For more Radhika Jones news, you can click here:
more Radhika Jones newsFor more SCOTUS news, you can click here:
more SCOTUS newsFor more news from Condé Nast, you can click here:
more news from Condé NastOtherweb, Inc is a public benefit corporation, dedicated to improving the quality of news people consume. We are non-partisan, junk-free, and ad-free. We use artificial intelligence (AI) to remove junk from your news feed, and allow you to select the best politics news, business news, entertainment news, and much more. If you like this article about SCOTUS, you might also like this article about
Supreme Court justice Amy Coney Barrett. We are dedicated to bringing you the highest-quality news, junk-free and ad-free, about your favorite topics. Please come every day to read the latest conservative judicial bent news, fellow justices news, news about SCOTUS, and other high-quality news about any topic that interests you. We are working hard to create the best news aggregator on the web, and to put you in control of your news feed - whether you choose to read the latest news through our website, our news app, or our daily newsletter - all free!
liberal justicesCondé Nast
•US Politics
US Politics
64% Informative
VF 's Radhika Jones , Claire Howorth and Michael Calderone discuss Amy Coney Barrett's path to the high court.
Barrett 's confirmation to the Supreme Court in 2020 was controversial.
She joined a conservative majority in Dobbs v. Jackson , obliterating the nearly 50-year precedent that protected the national right to an abortion.
VR Score
68
Informative language
70
Neutral language
18
Article tone
semi-formal
Language
English
Language complexity
53
Offensive language
not offensive
Hate speech
not hateful
Attention-grabbing headline
detected
Known propaganda techniques
detected
Time-value
short-lived
External references
4
Source diversity
4
Affiliate links
no affiliate links
