Supreme Court Reviews Trump's Remaking
This is a news story, published by PBS, that relates primarily to The Supreme Court news.
News about SCOTUS
For more SCOTUS news, you can click here:
more SCOTUS newsPBS news
For more news from PBS, you can click here:
more news from PBSAbout the Otherweb
Otherweb, Inc is a public benefit corporation, dedicated to improving the quality of news people consume. We are non-partisan, junk-free, and ad-free. We use artificial intelligence (AI) to remove junk from your news feed, and allow you to select the best politics news, business news, entertainment news, and much more. If you like this article about SCOTUS, you might also like this article about
federal judges. We are dedicated to bringing you the highest-quality news, junk-free and ad-free, about your favorite topics. Please come every day to read the latest justices news, Chief Justice news, news about SCOTUS, and other high-quality news about any topic that interests you. We are working hard to create the best news aggregator on the web, and to put you in control of your news feed - whether you choose to read the latest news through our website, our news app, or our daily newsletter - all free!
Supreme CourtPBS
•US Politics
US Politics
The Supreme Court has rejected some Trump administration moves in small but meaningful ways
70% Informative
The Supreme Court rejected the Republican administration’s position that it had the power to fire the head of a watchdog office.
In the other, the court slowed the effort to block the release of up to $2 billion in foreign aid.
The short-term losses for the administration may mean little, and the court's actions arguably reflect less about whether Trump was right or wrong in either case.
The Supreme Court has played a limited role so far, but Trump ’s presidency is less than two months old .
Experts say the justices appear inclined to allow the president more power to hire and fire agency heads.
The scale of the federal layoffs that the new administration wants to carry out could also put federal employment law in front of the high court.