Vance's Remarks Misinterpreted

This is a US news story, published by MSN, that relates primarily to JD Vance news.

US news

For more US news, you can click here:

more US news

JD Vance news

For more JD Vance news, you can click here:

more JD Vance news

News about Us involvement in foreign conflicts

For more Us involvement in foreign conflicts news, you can click here:

more Us involvement in foreign conflicts news

MSN news

For more news from MSN, you can click here:

more news from MSN

About the Otherweb

Otherweb, Inc is a public benefit corporation, dedicated to improving the quality of news people consume. We are non-partisan, junk-free, and ad-free. We use artificial intelligence (AI) to remove junk from your news feed, and allow you to select the best politics news, business news, entertainment news, and much more. If you like this article about Us involvement in foreign conflicts, you might also like this article about

potential European deterrence force

. We are dedicated to bringing you the highest-quality news, junk-free and ad-free, about your favorite topics. Please come every day to read the latest deterrence mission news, Ukraine news, news about Us involvement in foreign conflicts, and other high-quality news about any topic that interests you. We are working hard to create the best news aggregator on the web, and to put you in control of your news feed - whether you choose to read the latest news through our website, our news app, or our daily newsletter - all free!

French deterrence mission

Telegraph

•

US Politics

Britain and France’s Ukraine peacekeeping force would be the end of the Nato alliance

Summary

Nutrition label

70% Informative

US vice-president JD Vance seemed to dismiss and insult the militaries of the UK and France on Fox News .

But it isn't ridiculous for the US to question value of a European -led deterrence mission inside Ukraine .

The credibility of a potential European deterrence force inside Ukraine depends on whether the capacity is present and whether the countries involved are willing to follow through and fight back if Russia breaks a peace deal.

Would the rest of the alliance stand by as member states are challenged, or enter the conflict? Neither choice would be appealing.

The first would compromise Article 5 , the pillar of the transatlantic alliance, by creating new exceptions to what it covers.

The second would bring Nato into a war with Russia .

Has Starmer thought of these contingencies?.

VR Score

Informative language

Neutral language

Article tone

semi-formal

Language

English

Language complexity