Google Embraces Conservative AI
This is a Gemini news story, published by TechCrunch, that relates primarily to Google news.
Gemini news
For more Gemini news, you can click here:
more Gemini newsNews about Ai policy and regulations
For more Ai policy and regulations news, you can click here:
more Ai policy and regulations newsTechCrunch news
For more news from TechCrunch, you can click here:
more news from TechCrunchAbout the Otherweb
Otherweb, Inc is a public benefit corporation, dedicated to improving the quality of news people consume. We are non-partisan, junk-free, and ad-free. We use artificial intelligence (AI) to remove junk from your news feed, and allow you to select the best tech news, business news, entertainment news, and much more. If you like this article about Ai policy and regulations, you might also like this article about
AI chatbots. We are dedicated to bringing you the highest-quality news, junk-free and ad-free, about your favorite topics. Please come every day to read the latest Other chatbots news, chatbot news, news about Ai policy and regulations, and other high-quality news about any topic that interests you. We are working hard to create the best news aggregator on the web, and to put you in control of your news feed - whether you choose to read the latest news through our website, our news app, or our daily newsletter - all free!
chatbotsTechCrunch
•Technology
Technology
Google still limits how Gemini answers political questions | TechCrunch

67% Informative
Google ’s Gemini AI-powered chatbot sometimes refuses to answer questions about politics.
The company announced in March that Gemini wouldn’t answer election-related queries leading up to several elections taking place in the U.S. , India , and other countries.
Other AI labs have tried to strike a balance in answering sensitive political questions.
Google hasn't publicly announced plans to change how Gemini treats political topics.
VR Score
73
Informative language
75
Neutral language
60
Article tone
formal
Language
English
Language complexity
64
Offensive language
not offensive
Hate speech
not hateful
Attention-grabbing headline
not detected
Known propaganda techniques
not detected
Time-value
short-lived
External references
no external sources
Source diversity
no sources
Affiliate links
no affiliate links