Proposed Rule Limits Confidentiality
This is a news story, published by financialpost, that relates primarily to Gabor Lukacs news.
Gabor Lukacs news
For more Gabor Lukacs news, you can click here:
more Gabor Lukacs newsconsumer & retail news
For more consumer & retail news, you can click here:
more consumer & retail newsfinancialpost news
For more news from financialpost, you can click here:
more news from financialpostAbout the Otherweb
Otherweb, Inc is a public benefit corporation, dedicated to improving the quality of news people consume. We are non-partisan, junk-free, and ad-free. We use artificial intelligence (AI) to remove junk from your news feed, and allow you to select the best business news, entertainment news, world news, and much more. If you like consumer & retail news, you might also like this article about
Passenger rights advocates. We are dedicated to bringing you the highest-quality news, junk-free and ad-free, about your favorite topics. Please come every day to read the latest routine enforcement powers news, Airline regulator news, consumer & retail news, and other high-quality news about any topic that interests you. We are working hard to create the best news aggregator on the web, and to put you in control of your news feed - whether you choose to read the latest news through our website, our news app, or our daily newsletter - all free!
Passenger rights advocate Gabor Lukacsfinancialpost
•Business
Business & Economics
Advocates decry proposal to fine air travellers who breach confidentiality
59% Informative
The Canadian Transportation Agency is putting forward an amendment that would allow it to fine airline customers who breach confidentiality regarding complaints they file with the regulator.
The current complaint resolution process bars customers and airlines from publicly disclosing the outcome of complaints.
Passenger rights advocate Gabor Lukacs says the would-be regulatory change amounts to a gag order with teeth.
The transportation agency says the rule would merely add routine enforcement powers to a confidentiality provision.
VR Score
65
Informative language
67
Neutral language
64
Article tone
informal
Language
English
Language complexity
76
Offensive language
not offensive
Hate speech
not hateful
Attention-grabbing headline
not detected
Known propaganda techniques
not detected
Time-value
short-lived
External references
no external sources
Source diversity
no sources