KKR, Fountainvest, PAG Eye Starbucks Stake
This is a China news story, published by Yahoo Finance, that relates primarily to KKR & Co news.
China news
For more China news, you can click here:
more China newsNews about Asia business & economics
For more Asia business & economics news, you can click here:
more Asia business & economics newsYahoo Finance news
For more news from Yahoo Finance, you can click here:
more news from Yahoo FinanceAbout the Otherweb
Otherweb, Inc is a public benefit corporation, dedicated to improving the quality of news people consume. We are non-partisan, junk-free, and ad-free. We use artificial intelligence (AI) to remove junk from your news feed, and allow you to select the best business news, entertainment news, world news, and much more. If you like this article about Asia business & economics, you might also like this article about
Starbucks China. We are dedicated to bringing you the highest-quality news, junk-free and ad-free, about your favorite topics. Please come every day to read the latest China business news, Chinese companies news, news about Asia business & economics, and other high-quality news about any topic that interests you. We are working hard to create the best news aggregator on the web, and to put you in control of your news feed - whether you choose to read the latest news through our website, our news app, or our daily newsletter - all free!
StarbucksReuters
•World
World
Exclusive-KKR, Fountainvest and PAG among those eyeing Starbucks China stake, sources say

81% Informative
KKR & Co , Fountainvest Partners and PAG are among buyout firms interested in acquiring a stake in Starbucks ' China business.
Chinese companies, including state-owned conglomerate China Resources Holdings and food delivery giant Meituan , have also been approached as potential buyers.
The size of the stake to be sold has not been determined and would be subject to negotiations.
VR Score
91
Informative language
97
Neutral language
74
Article tone
formal
Language
English
Language complexity
57
Offensive language
not offensive
Hate speech
not hateful
Attention-grabbing headline
not detected
Known propaganda techniques
not detected
Time-value
short-lived
External references
no external sources
Source diversity
no sources
Affiliate links
no affiliate links