This is a England news story, published by Guardian, that relates primarily to Charlotte Owen news.
For more England news, you can click here:
more England newsFor more Charlotte Owen news, you can click here:
more Charlotte Owen newsFor more celebrity news, you can click here:
more celebrity newsFor more news from Guardian, you can click here:
more news from GuardianOtherweb, Inc is a public benefit corporation, dedicated to improving the quality of news people consume. We are non-partisan, junk-free, and ad-free. We use artificial intelligence (AI) to remove junk from your news feed, and allow you to select the best entertainment news, business news, world news, and much more. If you like celebrity news, you might also like this article about
intimate image abuse cases. We are dedicated to bringing you the highest-quality news, junk-free and ad-free, about your favorite topics. Please come every day to read the latest intimate image abuse news, delete abusive photos news, celebrity news, and other high-quality news about any topic that interests you. We are working hard to create the best news aggregator on the web, and to put you in control of your news feed - whether you choose to read the latest news through our website, our news app, or our daily newsletter - all free!
intimate image crimeGuardian
•Entertainment
Entertainment
74% Informative
Of 98 cases involving intimate image abuse cases in England and Wales in the past six months , just three resulted in a deprivation order.
CPS said more must be done to “stop perpetrators retaining these images and continuing to take gratification from their crimes” The Observer analysis looked at cases of sharing or threatening to share intimate photos of a person without consent.
Of 98 defendants, 54 were also given restraining orders lasting from one to five years .
Three cases where prosecutors did request deprivation orders included one in December in Bromley , southeast London .
Conservative peer Charlotte Owen said she was “appalled’ that content was being destroyed in so few cases.
The government responded that it would be “constitutionally inappropriate” to do so.
VR Score
71
Informative language
67
Neutral language
36
Article tone
informal
Language
English
Language complexity
57
Offensive language
likely offensive
Hate speech
not hateful
Attention-grabbing headline
not detected
Known propaganda techniques
not detected
Time-value
short-lived
External references
5
Source diversity
5
Affiliate links
no affiliate links
