This is a U.S. news story, published by TechCrunch, that relates primarily to Ross news.
For more U.S. news, you can click here:
more U.S. newsFor more Ross news, you can click here:
more Ross newsFor more Ai policy and regulations news, you can click here:
more Ai policy and regulations newsFor more news from TechCrunch, you can click here:
more news from TechCrunchOtherweb, Inc is a public benefit corporation, dedicated to improving the quality of news people consume. We are non-partisan, junk-free, and ad-free. We use artificial intelligence (AI) to remove junk from your news feed, and allow you to select the best tech news, business news, entertainment news, and much more. If you like this article about Ai policy and regulations, you might also like this article about
AI lawsuits. We are dedicated to bringing you the highest-quality news, junk-free and ad-free, about your favorite topics. Please come every day to read the latest legal tech firm Ross Intelligence news, copyright lawsuits news, news about Ai policy and regulations, and other high-quality news about any topic that interests you. We are working hard to create the best news aggregator on the web, and to put you in control of your news feed - whether you choose to read the latest news through our website, our news app, or our daily newsletter - all free!
AI copyright caseTechCrunch
•Technology
Technology
85% Informative
A U.S. federal judge ruled in a case brought by Thomson Reuters against legal tech firm Ross Intelligence .
The judge found that Ross ’ use of Reuters ’ content to train its AI legal research platform infringed on Reuters intellectual property.
Ross argued that its use of copyrighted headnotes was legally defensible because it was transformative, meaning it repurposed the headnotes to serve a markedly different function or market.
“Although the court hinted this might be different from a situation involving generative AI , it’s easy to see a news site arguing that copying its articles for training a generative AI is no different because the generative AI uses the copyrighted articles to compete with the news site for user attention.” In other words, publishers and copyright owners duking it out with AI companies have slight reason to be optimistic after the decision — emphasis on slight..
VR Score
87
Informative language
86
Neutral language
76
Article tone
semi-formal
Language
English
Language complexity
60
Offensive language
not offensive
Hate speech
not hateful
Attention-grabbing headline
not detected
Known propaganda techniques
not detected
Time-value
short-lived
External references
4
Source diversity
3
Affiliate links
no affiliate links
