Oldham Council Seeks PfE Withdrawal
This is a Greater Manchester news story, published by men, that relates primarily to Oldham news.
Greater Manchester news
For more Greater Manchester news, you can click here:
more Greater Manchester newsOldham news
For more Oldham news, you can click here:
more Oldham newsreal estate & housing news
For more real estate & housing news, you can click here:
more real estate & housing newsmen news
For more news from men, you can click here:
more news from menAbout the Otherweb
Otherweb, Inc is a public benefit corporation, dedicated to improving the quality of news people consume. We are non-partisan, junk-free, and ad-free. We use artificial intelligence (AI) to remove junk from your news feed, and allow you to select the best business news, entertainment news, world news, and much more. If you like real estate & housing news, you might also like this article about
Oldham council executives. We are dedicated to bringing you the highest-quality news, junk-free and ad-free, about your favorite topics. Please come every day to read the latest Oldham news, best Oldham news, real estate & housing news, and other high-quality news about any topic that interests you. We are working hard to create the best news aggregator on the web, and to put you in control of your news feed - whether you choose to read the latest news through our website, our news app, or our daily newsletter - all free!
Oldham councilmen
•Business
Business & Economics
Andy Burnham speaks out after borough votes to leave in major blow to masterplan

63% Informative
Oldham council narrowly voted to request permission to withdraw from PfE , the mayor’s 15-year development blueprint covering nine Greater Manchester boroughs.
The plan allows developers to build on sections of the green belt, but has a brownfield land first ’ policy.
Stockport voted to leave PfE in late 2020 , before it was formally adopted in spring last year .
VR Score
66
Informative language
64
Neutral language
60
Article tone
informal
Language
English
Language complexity
42
Offensive language
not offensive
Hate speech
not hateful
Attention-grabbing headline
not detected
Known propaganda techniques
not detected
Time-value
short-lived
External references
no external sources
Source diversity
no sources
Affiliate links
no affiliate links