This is a news story, published by Christian Science Monitor, that relates primarily to USDA news.
For more agriculture news, you can click here:
more agriculture newsFor more news from Christian Science Monitor, you can click here:
more news from Christian Science MonitorOtherweb, Inc is a public benefit corporation, dedicated to improving the quality of news people consume. We are non-partisan, junk-free, and ad-free. We use artificial intelligence (AI) to remove junk from your news feed, and allow you to select the best business news, entertainment news, world news, and much more. If you like agriculture news, you might also like this article about
USDA officials. We are dedicated to bringing you the highest-quality news, junk-free and ad-free, about your favorite topics. Please come every day to read the latest USDA grants news, Trump administration news, agriculture news, and other high-quality news about any topic that interests you. We are working hard to create the best news aggregator on the web, and to put you in control of your news feed - whether you choose to read the latest news through our website, our news app, or our daily newsletter - all free!
USAID cropChristian Science Monitor
•Business
Business & Economics
79% Informative
Farmers who sell surplus crops to the U.S. Agency for International Development for overseas distribution are fretting about future purchases.
Business owners that qualified for USDA grants and invested in renewable energy technology and climate-resistant crops are unsure if they will be paid.
The White House has framed DOGE ’s slash-and-burn approach as a once-in-a-lifetime opportunity to shrink the government.
The Iowa Soybean Association says its members are at financial risk because of suspended reimbursements.
Congress passed a bill in January that authorized $10 billion in emergency aid for farmers of designated crops.
Republicans are reportedly preparing legislation to salvage a $1.8 billion USAID crop-purchasing program by transferring it to the USDA .
VR Score
80
Informative language
76
Neutral language
65
Article tone
formal
Language
English
Language complexity
56
Offensive language
not offensive
Hate speech
not hateful
Attention-grabbing headline
not detected
Known propaganda techniques
not detected
Time-value
short-lived
External references
14
Source diversity
13
Affiliate links
no affiliate links
