This is a news story, published by edmontonjournal, that relates primarily to Brian Lawton news.
For more Brian Lawton news, you can click here:
more Brian Lawton newsFor more hockey news, you can click here:
more hockey newsFor more news from edmontonjournal, you can click here:
more news from edmontonjournalOtherweb, Inc is a public benefit corporation, dedicated to improving the quality of news people consume. We are non-partisan, junk-free, and ad-free. We use artificial intelligence (AI) to remove junk from your news feed, and allow you to select the best sport news, business news, entertainment news, and much more. If you like hockey news, you might also like this article about
Oilers defence. We are dedicated to bringing you the highest-quality news, junk-free and ad-free, about your favorite topics. Please come every day to read the latest confident Klingberg news, top defenceman news, hockey news, and other high-quality news about any topic that interests you. We are working hard to create the best news aggregator on the web, and to put you in control of your news feed - whether you choose to read the latest news through our website, our news app, or our daily newsletter - all free!
goalieedmontonjournal
•Sports
Sports
65% Informative
Two former NHL insiders say the Oilers need a top defenceman on or before the March 7 trade deadline.
Brian Lawton and Craig MacTavish recommend acquiring a top d-man.
Lawton likes what he’s seen of John Klingberg , but is not certain the Oilers will get enough looks at the Swede , who had been out after double hip surgery for more than a year .
MacTevish says size matters in the playoffs when you get down to the conference finals and the finals.
The Oilers need a big, rugged and effective checking centre as a top priority.
But there’s plenty more time until the trade deadline, seven more games in total.
After four or five more games, we’ll have that much better idea if Klingberg can get the job done.
VR Score
64
Informative language
61
Neutral language
36
Article tone
informal
Language
English
Language complexity
22
Offensive language
not offensive
Hate speech
not hateful
Attention-grabbing headline
not detected
Known propaganda techniques
not detected
Time-value
short-lived
External references
12
Source diversity
7
