Prince George Diocese Settles Abuse Case
This is a news story, published by vancouversun, that relates primarily to John Doe news.
John Doe news
For more John Doe news, you can click here:
more John Doe newsNews about civil rights activism
For more civil rights activism news, you can click here:
more civil rights activism newsvancouversun news
For more news from vancouversun, you can click here:
more news from vancouversunAbout the Otherweb
Otherweb, Inc is a public benefit corporation, dedicated to improving the quality of news people consume. We are non-partisan, junk-free, and ad-free. We use artificial intelligence (AI) to remove junk from your news feed, and allow you to select the best politics news, business news, entertainment news, and much more. If you like this article about civil rights activism, you might also like this article about
sexual abuse lawsuit. We are dedicated to bringing you the highest-quality news, junk-free and ad-free, about your favorite topics. Please come every day to read the latest Diocese news, Roman Catholic Diocese news, news about civil rights activism, and other high-quality news about any topic that interests you. We are working hard to create the best news aggregator on the web, and to put you in control of your news feed - whether you choose to read the latest news through our website, our news app, or our daily newsletter - all free!
sexual abuse incidentsvancouversun
•US Politics
US Politics
Prince George Catholic church settles sexual abuse lawsuit

55% Informative
The Roman Catholic Diocese of Prince George has settled a sexual abuse lawsuit on the eve of a 23-day trial that was set to open on Tuesday .
The Catholic Church and St. Thomas More Collegiate settled with the plaintiff, anonymized as John Doe , for $3.4 million including legal costs.
The trial was to reveal how John Doe was groomed and sexually abused by a Christian Brothers teacher.
VR Score
63
Informative language
67
Neutral language
27
Article tone
formal
Language
English
Language complexity
60
Offensive language
likely offensive
Hate speech
not hateful
Attention-grabbing headline
not detected
Known propaganda techniques
not detected
Time-value
short-lived
External references
no external sources
Source diversity
no sources