Lawyer Misuses AI in Immigration Case
This is a Australia news story, published by Yahoo News Canada, that relates primarily to AI news.
Australia news
For more Australia news, you can click here:
more Australia newsNews about Ai policy and regulations
For more Ai policy and regulations news, you can click here:
more Ai policy and regulations newsYahoo News Canada news
For more news from Yahoo News Canada, you can click here:
more news from Yahoo News CanadaAbout the Otherweb
Otherweb, Inc is a public benefit corporation, dedicated to improving the quality of news people consume. We are non-partisan, junk-free, and ad-free. We use artificial intelligence (AI) to remove junk from your news feed, and allow you to select the best tech news, business news, entertainment news, and much more. If you like this article about Ai policy and regulations, you might also like this article about
AI inventing case citations. We are dedicated to bringing you the highest-quality news, junk-free and ad-free, about your favorite topics. Please come every day to read the latest legal profession news, legal practitioners news, news about Ai policy and regulations, and other high-quality news about any topic that interests you. We are working hard to create the best news aggregator on the web, and to put you in control of your news feed - whether you choose to read the latest news through our website, our news app, or our daily newsletter - all free!
legal practitionerGuardian
•Technology
Technology
Fake cases, judges’ headaches and new limits: Australian courts grapple with lawyers using AI
84% Informative
The full extent of the use of artificial intelligence in the legal profession is unknown.
Thomson Reuters surveyed 869 private practice professionals in Australia last year .
Nearly one in three said they would like a generative AI legal assistant.
A Melbourne lawyer was referred to the Victorian legal complaints body after admitting using AI software in a family court case.
A practice note issued by the NSW supreme court put limits on the use of generative AI by lawyers.
It stipulates it must not be used to generate affidavits, witness statements, character references or other material tendered in evidence or used in cross-examination.
A professor of law and the director of the Centre for AI and Digital Ethics at the University of Melbourne says the errors may be seen from lawyers with fewer resources or experience.
VR Score
88
Informative language
89
Neutral language
43
Article tone
informal
Language
English
Language complexity
60
Offensive language
not offensive
Hate speech
not hateful
Attention-grabbing headline
not detected
Known propaganda techniques
not detected
Time-value
short-lived
External references
5
Affiliate links
no affiliate links