This is a news story, published by Yahoo, that relates primarily to Donald Trump news.
For more Donald Trump news, you can click here:
more Donald Trump newsFor more Us federal policies news, you can click here:
more Us federal policies newsFor more news from Yahoo, you can click here:
more news from YahooOtherweb, Inc is a public benefit corporation, dedicated to improving the quality of news people consume. We are non-partisan, junk-free, and ad-free. We use artificial intelligence (AI) to remove junk from your news feed, and allow you to select the best politics news, business news, entertainment news, and much more. If you like this article about Us federal policies, you might also like this article about
scientific journal. We are dedicated to bringing you the highest-quality news, junk-free and ad-free, about your favorite topics. Please come every day to read the latest CDC researchers news, CDC scientists news, news about Us federal policies, and other high-quality news about any topic that interests you. We are working hard to create the best news aggregator on the web, and to put you in control of your news feed - whether you choose to read the latest news through our website, our news app, or our daily newsletter - all free!
Prevention scientistsReuters
•US Politics
US Politics
80% Informative
Scientists are struggling to respond to a Trump administration order to review papers already submitted for publication for content now banned by the federal government.
The directive issued on Jan. 31 applies to all research that features work from U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention scientists.
It aims to comply with President Donald Trump 's executive order recognizing only two sexes male and female.
British Medical Journal editors call the order "sinister and ludicrous".
VR Score
90
Informative language
96
Neutral language
77
Article tone
formal
Language
English
Language complexity
67
Offensive language
possibly offensive
Hate speech
not hateful
Attention-grabbing headline
not detected
Known propaganda techniques
not detected
Time-value
short-lived
External references
no external sources
Source diversity
no sources
Affiliate links
no affiliate links